Media Releases

Expert report reveals Internet providers should be more transparent about how they handle our private information

March 27, 2014

TORONTO, ON – A new report by lead­ing pri­va­cy experts has revealed that Cana­di­an Inter­net providers need to be much more trans­par­ent about how they pro­tect their cus­tomers’ pri­vate infor­ma­tion. The report found that while all providers had room for improve­ment, small­er inde­pen­dent providers tend to be more trans­par­ent over­all than their larg­er coun­ter­parts. Small­er providers also got cred­it for being more trans­par­ent about their user pri­va­cy pro­tec­tion and for more vis­i­bly keep­ing domes­tic Cana­di­an Inter­net traf­fic with­in Cana­da.

The report, enti­tled Keep­ing Inter­net Users in the Know or in the Dark, is being released today by IXmaps.ca and New Trans­paren­cy Projects. The report offers Cana­di­ans an in-depth look at the Data Pri­va­cy Trans­paren­cy of Cana­di­an Inter­net Ser­vice Providers (ISPs). The authors have also released an at-a-glance ‘Star Table’ rat­ing ISPs accord­ing to 10 trans­paren­cy cri­te­ria. Cana­di­ans can use this chart to see how their provider com­pares with oth­ers. The ISP ‘star rat­ings can also be seen in rela­tion to one’s per­son­al inter­net traf­fic using the Explore fea­ture of the IXmaps.ca inter­net map­ping tool.

The study found that there was plen­ty of room for improve­ment among the 20 ISPs cov­ered by the report. How­ev­er, small­er, inde­pen­dent Cana­di­an car­ri­ers scored bet­ter over­all than larg­er incum­bents. Inde­pen­dent provider Tek­Savvy earned more stars across more cat­e­gories than oth­er ISPs. Cana­di­an ISPs were over­all more trans­par­ent than the for­eign car­ri­ers that han­dle domes­tic Cana­di­an inter­net traf­fic. They gen­er­al­ly don’t even acknowl­edge their com­pli­ance with Cana­di­an pri­va­cy law, notably the Per­son­al Infor­ma­tion Pro­tec­tion and Elec­tron­ic Doc­u­ments Act (PIPEDA).

The project was spear­head­ed by Prof. Andrew Clement and Dr. Jonathan Obar at the Fac­ul­ty of Infor­ma­tion, Uni­ver­si­ty of Toron­to. Pro­fes­sor Clement explains that: “We’ve just seen that in 99% of Cana­di­an Bor­der Ser­vices Agency’s requests for sub­scriber infor­ma­tion, tele­com com­pa­nies have turned this sen­si­tive data over with­out a war­rant. Inter­net providers must be account­able to the Cana­di­an pub­lic for how they han­dle our per­son­al infor­ma­tion. ISPs that proac­tive­ly demon­strate trans­paren­cy can show lead­er­ship in the glob­al bat­tle for data pri­va­cy pro­tec­tion and bring­ing state sur­veil­lance under demo­c­ra­t­ic gov­er­nance.”

OpenMedia.ca, a com­mu­ni­ty-based orga­ni­za­tion lead­ing a 34,000-strong nation­wide pro-pri­va­cy cam­paign, says the report has revealed that Cana­di­ans need bet­ter account­abil­i­ty from their ISPs, espe­cial­ly from the tele­com giants.

“Cana­di­ans deserve to know whether their tele­com provider has their back when it comes to how they pro­tect your pri­va­cy,” says OpenMedia.ca Exec­u­tive Direc­tor Steve Ander­son. “Today’s report will make it eas­i­er for Cana­di­ans to make informed choic­es about which Inter­net provider to trust with their per­son­al infor­ma­tion. It’s clear from these detailed find­ings that small­er providers are more trans­par­ent about the mea­sures they take to pro­tect cus­tomer pri­va­cy — infor­ma­tion cus­tomers need to assess which Inter­net provider is best for them.”

Ander­son con­tin­ued: “Nev­er­the­less, all Inter­net providers have plen­ty of room for improve­ment. With so much of our pri­vate infor­ma­tion now online, every Inter­net provider has a duty to safe­guard Cana­di­ans from mass gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance — for­eign and Cana­di­an. They also need to be much more trans­par­ent about the extent of their coop­er­a­tion with war­rant­less gov­ern­ment spy­ing — Cana­di­ans deserve to know exact­ly how often the gov­ern­ment tries to invade their pri­va­cy, and exact­ly what their ISP is doing to pro­tect them.”

The report makes a num­ber of pol­i­cy rec­om­men­da­tions aimed at improv­ing ISP trans­paren­cy:

  • ISPs should make pub­lic detailed infor­ma­tion about their com­mit­ment to being trans­par­ent about when, why, and how they trans­fer pri­vate cus­tomer infor­ma­tion to the state and oth­er third par­ties.
  • The fed­er­al Pri­va­cy Com­mis­sion­er and CRTC should more close­ly over­see ISPs to ensure their data pri­va­cy trans­paren­cy, and in par­tic­u­lar that they only hand off Inter­net traf­fic to car­ri­ers with com­pa­ra­ble pri­va­cy pro­tec­tions as those in Cana­di­an pri­va­cy law.
  • Leg­is­la­tors should reform pri­va­cy laws to include robust trans­paren­cy norms.

The research has been sup­port­ed by the Social Sci­ences and Human­i­ties Research Coun­cil and the Office of the Pri­va­cy Com­mis­sion­er of Cana­da. The views expressed are those of the authors alone.

OpenMedia.ca, Pro­fes­sor Andrew Clement and Dr. Jonathan Obar are part of the Pro­tect our Pri­va­cy Coali­tion, which is call­ing for effec­tive legal mea­sures to pro­tect the pri­va­cy of every res­i­dent of Cana­da against intru­sion by gov­ern­ment enti­ties.

Over 34,000 Cana­di­ans have spo­ken out about gov­ern­ment spy­ing in recent months at: https://openmedia.org/csec and http://OurPrivacy.ca

About the IXmaps.ca research project:

Since 2008, the IXmaps.ca project has worked to help inter­net users “see where your data pack­ets go”, with the aim of rais­ing pub­lic aware­ness of the pri­va­cy impli­ca­tions of inter­net data pack­et rout­ing. In par­tic­u­lar, the project has mapped the sites of like­ly NSA inter­cep­tion in the U.S., enabling users to see whether their inter­net traf­fic may have been cap­tured.  It has also doc­u­ment­ed the exten­sive Cana­di­an “boomerang traf­fic” — inter­net com­mu­ni­ca­tion that starts in Cana­da and ends in Cana­da, but which pass­es through the US where it is sub­ject to NSA sur­veil­lance. The project has received fund­ing from the Social Sci­ences and Human­i­ties Research Coun­cil of Cana­da and the Office of the Pri­va­cy Com­mis­sion­er of Cana­da and is affil­i­at­ed with the New Trans­paren­cy Project and the Infor­ma­tion Pol­i­cy Research Pro­gram at the Fac­ul­ty of Infor­ma­tionUni­ver­si­ty of Toron­to.

About OpenMedia.ca

OpenMedia.ca is an award-win­ning net­work of peo­ple and orga­ni­za­tions work­ing to safe­guard the pos­si­bil­i­ties of the open Inter­net. We work toward informed and par­tic­i­pa­to­ry dig­i­tal pol­i­cy.

Through cam­paigns such as StopTheMeter.ca and StopSpying.caOpenMedia.ca has engaged over half-a-mil­lion Cana­di­ans, and has influ­enced pub­lic pol­i­cy and fed­er­al law.

About OpenMedia.ca’s pri­va­cy cam­paign

OpenMedia.ca led the suc­cess­ful StopSpying.ca cam­paign that forced the gov­ern­ment to back down on its plans to intro­duce a cost­ly, inva­sive, and war­rant­less online spy­ing law (Bill C‑30). Near­ly 150,000 Cana­di­ans took part in the cam­paign. To learn more, see this info­graph­ic.

On Octo­ber 10, 2013 OpenMedia.ca col­lab­o­rat­ed with over 35 major orga­ni­za­tions and over a dozen aca­d­e­m­ic experts to form the Pro­tect Our Pri­va­cy Coali­tion, which is the largest pro-pri­va­cy coali­tion in Cana­di­an his­to­ry. The Coali­tion is call­ing for effec­tive legal mea­sures to pro­tect the pri­va­cy of every res­i­dent of Cana­da against intru­sion by gov­ern­ment enti­ties.

OpenMedia.ca and the BC Civ­il Lib­er­ties Asso­ci­a­tion (BCCLA) recent­ly announced they will work togeth­er to put a stop to ille­gal gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance against law-abid­ing Cana­di­ans. OpenMedia.ca has launched a nation­al cam­paign encour­ag­ing Cana­di­ans to sup­port a BCCLA legal action which aims to stop ille­gal spy­ing by chal­leng­ing the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of the government’s war­rant­less col­lec­tion of data on Cana­di­ans’ every­day Inter­net use.

-30-

Media Con­tacts

Andrew Clement
Pro­fes­sor
Fac­ul­ty of Infor­ma­tion, Uni­ver­si­ty of Toron­to
Tel: 416–922-0251
andrew.clement@utoronto.ca

David Christo­pher
Com­mu­ni­ca­tions Man­ag­er, OpenMedia.ca
Tel: 778–232-1858
david@openmedia.ca

Media Rela­tions
Uni­ver­si­ty of Toron­to
Tel: 417–978-0100
media.relations@utoronto.ca


More Infor­ma­tion

  • Tele­com firms hand­ed CBSA pri­vate cus­tomer data over 18,000 times last year with­out a war­rant. Source: The Chron­i­cle Her­ald
  • Inter­net sur­veil­lance and boomerang rout­ing: A call for Cana­di­an net­work sov­er­eign­ty — Source: Jonathan Obar and Andrew Clement
  • IXmaps – Track­ing your per­son­al data through the NSA’s war­rant­less wire­tap­ping sites, 2013 IEEE Inter­na­tion­al Sym­po­sium on Tech­nol­o­gy and Soci­ety (ISTAS), Toron­to, June 27–29, 2013. Source: Andrew Clement
  • The murky state of Cana­di­an telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions sur­veil­lance. Source: Christo­pher Par­sons
  • Pro­posed online spy­ing bill would grant tele­com firms immu­ni­ty for hand­ing over pri­vate infor­ma­tion with­out a war­rant. Source: Michael Geist
  • Pri­va­cy experts ask tele­coms if they’re help­ing the gov­ern­ment spy on Cana­di­ans. Source: OpenMedia.ca
  • New Snow­den docs show U.S. spied dur­ing G20 in Toron­to. Source: CBC News
  • Five high­lights from the Cana­da-Brazil spy­ing rev­e­la­tions. [Source: The Globe and Mail]
  • Pri­va­cy watch­dog on spy agency’s data col­lec­tion: ‘We want to find out more’. [Source: The Globe And Mail]
  • Canada’s spy agency may have ille­gal­ly tar­get­ed Cana­di­ans: watch­dog. [Source: Nation­al Post]
  • Inside Canada’s top-secret bil­lion-dol­lar spy palace. [Source: CBC News.]
  • Data breach pro­to­cols defi­cient in 9 fed­er­al depart­ments, watch­dog finds. — [Source: CBC News]
  • Law­ful Access back on the agen­da this Fall? — Michael Geist.
  • The secre­tive CSEC agency has a staff of more than 2,000 and a bud­get of about $400 mil­lion. [Source: CBC News]
  • Sur­veil­lance expert Ron Deib­ert on the threat spy agen­cies pose for cit­i­zens.
  • Inter­net Law expert Michael Geist on why Cana­di­ans should be con­cerned about gov­ern­ment spy­ing.
  • Pri­va­cy com­mis­sion­er Jen­nifer Stod­dart says there are sig­nif­i­cant con­cerns about the scope of infor­ma­tion that CSEC are report­ed to col­lect. [Source: CBC News]
  • In this arti­cle, The Globe and Mail describes the rev­e­la­tions about Cana­di­an gov­ern­ment spy­ing as “dis­turb­ing and unac­cept­able”
  • This doc­u­ment, obtained by The Globe through Access to Infor­ma­tion, shows how Min­is­ter MacK­ay autho­rized a top secret pro­gram to data-mine glob­al ‘meta­da­ta’ in 2011.